Execution-Reservation Layer

Your protocol is
leaking.

Swaps. Auctions. Votes. Claims. Any on-chain action. Bots extract value on every unprotected call. BondRoute stops the leak. No relayers. No solvers. No trust assumptions.

0 Trust assumptions
0 Protocol fees
1 File to integrate
Scroll
The Problem

Billions extracted.
Time to plug the sink.

Bots see pending transactions and act first. Swaps get sandwiched. Auctions get gamed. Liquidations get sniped. Existing solutions? They move extraction behind closed doors — builders, relays, solver networks. The leak continues. You just can't see it.

Approach Trust Required Extraction Auditable
Public mempool None Open season Yes
Private relays Builders Hidden % No
Private mempools Operators Hidden % No
Solver networks Solvers Discretionary No
BondRoute None Zero Yes
Unprotected execution leaks value.
Every call is an opportunity for extraction. BondRoute closes it.
The Mechanism

Execution is reserved.
Speculation is trapped.

Protected functions reject naked calls — bots can't just frontrun with higher gas. They'd need a bond created blocks earlier. Too late to react. Try to game it by pre-creating bonds? Protocols can require stakes that make speculation a losing game.

Pillar 01

Reserved Execution

No bond, no execution. When attackers see your transaction, they can't act — they'd need their own bond plus the delay. By then, it's done.

Pillar 02

Binding Economics

Protocols set the rules: stake size, timing, constraints. Pre-created bonds that hit at bad terms? Trapped. Execute at a loss or forfeit. The math works against speculators.

Failure is safe. Success is dangerous.
Bonds that fail validation exit gracefully—stake returned. Bonds that pass validation at bad terms are the trap: execute or forfeit. Honest users are unaffected. Speculators who hedge across outcomes get wrecked.
Use Cases

Anywhere free abandonment
enables exploitation

BondRoute is ideal for protocols where execution ordering matters, outcomes have asymmetric payoffs, and MEV extraction is economically meaningful.

Swaps & Trades

Loose slippage doesn't create safety—it creates traps. Price moves against attacker but stays within slippage? Execute at a loss or forfeit stake.

Auctions & Bids

Overbids are the trap. Below clearing price? Lose gracefully. Above clearing price? Forced to overpay or forfeit. Speculative bid ladders self-destruct.

Governance

Strategic timing and position gaming become costly. Binding commitments mean votes reflect genuine intent, not last-second manipulation.

Liquidations

Liquidation sniping blocked. Whoever finds the opportunity and commits to it keeps it—others can't steal with higher gas.

For Protocols

You don't rewrite your protocol.
You wrap execution.

One file. Two functions. No external dependencies. You define stake size, parameter strictness, and execution window. BondRoute enforces them.

import "./BondRouteProtected.sol";

contract YourProtocol is BondRouteProtected {

  function swap() external {
    BondContext memory ctx = BondRoute_initialize();
    // Your logic here. Users are protected.
  }

  function BondRoute_quote_call(...) public view {
    // Define stake, timing, constraints
  }
}
Trust Model

Verify once.
Trust the bytecode forever.

Not privacy tooling. Not a trusted relay. Not builder-dependent. Not security through obscurity. It's economic finality.

🔒

Immutable

No upgrade paths. No proxies. Deployed bytecode is final.

No Admin Keys

Nobody can pause, freeze, modify, or censor. Not even us.

💰

Zero Fees

Free primitive. No rent extraction. No vendor lock-in.

🌐

Same Address Everywhere

CREATE2 deterministic deployment. Verify once, trust everywhere.

Built in the Open

If it's wrong, it can be broken.
If it survives, it becomes infrastructure.

BondRoute doesn't stop attackers from seeing the future.
It stops them from deciding later whether they liked what they saw.